This article was originally delivered as a speech at a BC Government conference May 13th, 2011. It appeared in article form May 18th, 2011 in Fast Company.
Q: How do you know David Copperfield is a good magician?
A: Well, he got Claudia Schiffer to marry him. That’s one heck of a magic trick.
Groans aside, this old saw takes us to the heart of a real puzzle. How do you inspire people to do what you want?
It’s a subject I’m passionate about. After all, I’ve made my career as a persuader.
And though I haven’t found the holy grail, I’ve come close. I’d like to let you in on some tools that have helped me radically improve the effectiveness of my communication.
Hint: Advertising Isn’t The Answer
I was trained as an advertising copywriter in the glory days of TV, print, poster and radio.
I loved creating ads. But strangely, I didn’t like looking at them. They simply didn’t ‘get’ me, or where I was coming from. Nor did they appeal to my family, my friends, or folks I met who wanted to know what I did for a living.
I thought it might have had to do with lackluster insights. Which was why I was so excited to move into green advertising a few years back.
Finally, I had a message that would inspire action. Buy X, save the world.
Wrong again. As GreenBiz executive editor Joel Makower brilliantly wrote, green brands have performed anemically at best.
Social Media? Nope.
A few years ago, I was invited to speak about the connection between social media and the environmental movement.
Digging deeper into this new form of communication, I felt fresh hope. Unlike old school advertising, social media listened to consumer conversations, and injected brand messages in ways that actually added genuine value.
It seemed to be a tool that could break through consumer resistance, and create real action.
Well, not really.
Alas, digital friends or fans weren’t the real thing. They may like you. But they wouldn’t help move your furniture.
Social media was a terrific tool. But there was still something missing.
Answer 1: Belief
Happily, over the course of the last two years, I’ve stumbled onto three answers to the elusive do.
The first came from Simon Sinek, who speaks about why some leaders inspire action, while others do not.
He illustrates his point with what he calls the golden circle – an illustration that moves us through three concentric circles from rational communication to the emotional, movement-creating world of beliefs.
His observation demands more explanation than this column can provide. But suffice it to say, it helped me understand why some messages make us nod in approval, while others make us jump into action.
Answer 2: Empathy
The next answer came from Catherine Greener.
Catherine believes we can only get people to act by creating a bond of empathy with them.
In a conversation, she shared a story to illustrate.
Her team had been called in to consult on sustainability for an auto manufacturer. Walking the shop floor, she noticed a bin clearly marked ‘aluminum cans only’. But inside the bin was garbage, wrappers, and plastic.
The problem wasn’t signage, or the proximity of bins for other forms of garbage. It was lack of empathy between management and the shop floor workers.
So how did she create a bond to inspire positive action? With a simple sign above the aluminum can bin that read (and I paraphrase):
Recycling cans creates a less expensive source of aluminum
Which means we can build our engines cheaper
Which means we can sell our cars cheaper
Which means more people buy our cars
Which means you have job security.
The recycling bin filled right up. All because of a sign that demonstrated empathy with the shop workers’ priorities.
Answer 3: Worldviews
John Marshall Roberts provided the final inspiration I want to talk about today.
His answer to the elusive do comes with understanding worldviews.
Worldviews are, quite simply, the way different people perceive the world based on their nature, their surroundings, and their upbringing.
A host of worldviews have evolved over time. But today, four seem prevalent.
If we understand these four worldviews, we’ll be much closer to crafting messages that create motion.
The first worldview is Absolutistic. Absolutists seek order, have strong faith in a greater power, believe in sacrifice today for heavenly rewards. It’s the predominant worldview of the politically conservative, and religiously devout.
Next comes the Opportunistic worldview. The Opportunist regards the world as a game they’re smart enough to win at. They believe they’re justified in taking advantage of those who don’t understand the game. If things get ethically uncomfortable, they talk about ends justifying means. Opportunists enabled the great wealth of the 20th Century. They’re personified by entrepreneurs like Donald Trump.
Opportunists may be terrific at creating wealth, but they’re often spiritually unfulfilled by that achievement. This spiritual void led to the next evolution – the Humanistic worldview. Humanists believe there is more to life than money. They recognize the karmic importance of treating others well. You’ll find humanists among the ranks of hippies, liberals, and new agers.
From the Humanists and Opportunists evolved the final worldview prevalent today - Systemic thinkers. Systemics believe everything in the world is interconnected. Like Opportunists, they see through the veil of money. Like Humanists, they understand there is a connection between the happiness of others and their own happiness. And there’s a new twist – they regard environmental sustainability as key to their own success. Think Richard Branson or Barack Obama.
A Message For Action
I’d invite you to delve deeper into the teachings of Simon Sinek, Catherine Greener and John Marshall Roberts. They’ve provided me with tools I use every day to help clients craft more effective messaging.
Of course, I’d be happy to provide insights to help you along as well. Simply email or tweet me.
It would be wonderful to know this message helped you do something positive.


Great post Marc. Love seeing that Sinek’s work is influencing your perspective on messaging. I agree that it’s foundational. If you haven’t read them, check out the two books by the Heath brothers. Equally powerful frameworks in which to view truly effective communication. I’ve put their ideas to great use.
Thanks for reading, and for the encouraging words, Edwin. Haven’t read the latest Heath book. Will download it ASAP. Keep me posted on any new interesting writing or speaking ideas.
Cheers
M
Thanks Marc. I always enjoy the clarity of your writing, and I’m honored to be placed in such esteemed company.
I just posted on slideshare a presentation that I delivered in Minneapolis last week called “How to Overcome Cynicism with Scientific Psychobabble”. It went over very well with the account planning community at “Planningness 2011″ and I”m hopeful that the worldview framework is about to gain much larger traction with the so called ‘mainstream’ marketing world (many years in the making).
Here’s a link to the presentation if you and/or your audience wants to get a quick overview of worldview science as I’ve framed/developed it:
http://www.slideshare.net/jmarshallroberts/how-to-overcome-cynicism-with-scientific-psychobabble
Cheers,
John
John,
Thanks for the encouraging words. And thanks for sharing the slideshow. Look forward to spreading the worldview word with you!
Cheers
M
Marc,
Your article was like manna from heaven.
just yesterday morning in a first-time-meet with client we bantered how do you get people to help you move the furniture. First – almost instinctual response – is ‘no.’
Our client is a police union. Our job is to help them influence voters. To get them to view aiding the police force with a nominal increase in taxes not as a burden to the voter but as an asset. And also – to motivate voters to come out to the polls.
I, too, like you am old-school advertising trained. I don’t necessarily agree that things have changed so drastically. More so a shift in media. But – I’m gonna disclaim – this is a thought not completely thunk out.
Thanks for the thought-provoking article.
Cheers,
Mary Ellen Johnson
Thanks for the encouraging words, Mary Ellen. Let me know if there’s any other way I can help.
Cheers
M
Mark – another great post. Thanks for pointing out Greener’s idea – I might use it for our office, where people use far too many disposable items. I have only read 2 studies on the topic of environmental motivation – one demonstrated that people change their habits when those around them do – the other (not specifically environmental) showed that people who feel ethically superior are less likely to try and change their habits.
In my experience, few wealthy people are going to lead the revolution that we need. It’s traditionally been the poor who rise up and demand change. In my social circle, people are tossing their hands up and deciding on a moratorium on buying stuff. The “Victory Garden” mentality is spreading, but you’re not going to find it on Wall Street.
I appreciate what you said in the previous article – that green brands should make their claims “unassailable” if they want to earn the trust of consumers. The problem is that the FTC has lagged in their regulations. If a product claimed to cure wrinkles without proving it, the FTC would be all over them. Yet products left and right are making claims that they are “eco-friendly”, implying that it will not damage the earth, air or soil with its end product or industrial metabolism. Most of these claims are fluff at best or may be outright lies – yet they’re getting away with it. Consumers have a minefield to navigate and the economy is making consumers even more frustrated.
Pyrex and tiffin companies have been making relatively sustainable products for years – but (at least until recently) they do not brag about it. They merely make reliable, long-lasting and relatively inert products. Companies should simply do the right thing and be good enough to lend full disclosure about the materials or ingredients. The positive response to their honesty would probably be overwhelmingly positive.
Emmy,
Thanks for the encouraging feedback and thoughtful comments. I am definitely going to use the pyrex and tiffin examples you cited. I’m currently writing a piece on BrandLogic’s new research study on the perception / reality of companies green efforts. Seems there are a lot of companies taking credit for what they don’t do, and a lot of companies taking no credit for great strides they’ve made. The logic? In the latter case at least, it seems that once a company decides to make the effort, the first thing they discover is how far they really have to go! And that makes them very modest in proclaiming their ‘green-ness’. Interesting psychological snapshot there.
Keep up the comments, and let me know if you think there’s anything I should write about!
Cheers
M
Thanks Mark, I’m interested in persuasion also so I appreciate the offer. And ditto – I’m in a multidisciplinary network and I’m a good resource for information on ecology and eco-friendly living. If you Google “Timber Certification: Where Is the Voice of the Biologist?” (it’s a PDF) I’d be curious about how people percieve FSC products and if paper products are considered eco-friendly. (I wrote an ecology-related post on it. Here’s a link, and not to promote my blog. Just for context so I don’t have to leave another sermon-long comment).
http://emmiscafe.wordpress.com/2011/06/03/should-consumers-have-to-save-the-planet/
After I commented I found an informative (and amusing) broadcast from KQED about FTC regulations that I thought you’d find interesting.
http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201105271000